Explore public results now. Builder and Team are proposed plans for private evaluations, evidence history, and reviewed improvements.
Proposed pricing · billing is not activeBrowse sample answers and public website comparisons.
Keep private evaluations and their evidence in one place.
A proposed shared workspace for multiple sites and teammates.
Registering interest saves a private preference in your account. It does not start a subscription, reserve an allowance, charge your card, or send a message. Site limits, team features, and included credits are proposed.
Paid plans would fund the workspace and the cost of running evaluations. Payment would never change a score, buy a higher rank, or make a failed test disappear.
Our proposal defines one credit as $0.01 of metered provider spend. A run can use different amounts depending on its model, tools, and input. Credits are not a promise of a fixed number of evaluations.
We propose pausing paid runs until you choose to add more. An optional 1,000-credit pack would cost $15. No automatic top-ups or overage charges are planned.
No. Evaluation prompts, captured evidence, agent outputs, and your account remain private. The existing technical page index includes only site audits that you explicitly publish. Subscription status would not affect ranking.
Checkout is not enabled. These plans are a pricing proposal while we validate provider costs and the evaluation workflow. Registering interest records your preference so you can return to it later.